Conversation
1f2bec4 to
5088875
Compare
|
Thanks for the better grid. I'll try to eliminate the test failure and clean up the examples. Then, we'll just merge. |
|
Ok. Yes, we can keep both. |
|
the descriptive comment blocks at the beginning of the examples need an update, though |
|
Yeah, that's part of the cleanup |
|
Ok, please take a look. I'll squash this into one commit if the test runs through (and included the two examples!!) |
|
Looks good to me now! Are we also happy with the way the 3D body slightly bends downwards in the middle of the periodic boundary? |
bd4ae2a to
8513f34
Compare
|
Thanks! Forgot to add the two examples in the test. Commits are squashed. Waiting for CI to succeed. |
…atrix Add two examples to demonstate the feature.
8513f34 to
7692907
Compare
|
Please let us merge if CI is happy. The max value seems to be a little bit different on different systems. I lowered the test precision. |




This implements a better periodic boundary example to demonstrate the feature.
It is a 3D linear elastic plate glued in the central part of the bottom with an upwards pulling force.
Left and right boundary faces are combined periodically.
However, currently, it shows a strange error, that needs investigation.
The periodic boundary faces are pulled down...